基于最优让步均衡协调策略的供应链差价补偿机制研究

doi:10.15960/j.cnki.issn.1007-6093.2021.02.005

Abstract

Abstract:

In the supply chain, suppliers provide retailers with a compensation mechanism after the price of products is reduced, so as to encourage retailers to order more products. Therefore, we establish a price difference compensation mechanism model between manufacturer and retailer about a two stage sales. Firstly, we analyze results of the Nash equilibrium strategy and Stackelberg equilibrium strategy under the manufacturer to the retailer's price difference compensation mechanism of decision-making behavior. And then we obtain quantitative relationship of the price difference compensation mechanism under the optimal compromise equilibrium strategies. An algorithm of the approximate optimal compromise equilibrium strategy is proposed at a given price difference compensation coefficient. The case study of intelligent products shows that the mechanism of price difference compensation can improve the expected revenue of supply chain and increase the order quantity of retailers. It shows that the mechanism of price difference compensation can effectively improve relationships between suppliers and retailers.

Key words: supply chain contract, optimal concession equilibrium strategy, price difference compensation mechanism, intelligent product, game model

CLC Number:

O122.2

Min JIANG, Zhiqing MENG, Rui SHEN. Research on price difference compensation mechanism of supply chain based on optimal concession equilibrium coordination strategy[J]. Operations Research Transactions, 2021, 25(2): 67-80.

Figures/Tables 3

References 23

1	黄建华, 党延忠. 一类具有模糊补偿期限和降价周期的革新性产品EOQ模型[J]. 系统工程, 2008, 26 (11): 52- 58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2362.2008.11.022
2	黄松, 杨超, 张曦. 考虑战略顾客行为时的供应链性能分析与协调[J]. 管理科学学报, 2012, 15 (2): 47- 58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9807.2012.02.005
3	周海坚. 基于回购的二次降价销售供应链契约研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2008.
4	韩曙光, 沈雅玲. 基于回购契约的服装供应链两阶段销售订货研究[J]. 浙江理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 38 (1): 12- 16.
5	Coughlan A T , Shaffer G . Price-matching guarantees, retail competition, and product-line assortment[J]. Marketing Science, 2009, 28 (3): 580- 588. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1080.0404
6	Lai G , Debo L G , Sycara K . Buy now and match later: Impact of posterior price matching on profit with strategic consumers[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2010, 12 (1): 33- 55.
7	Kukar-Kinney M , Grewal D . Consumer willingness to claim a price-matching refund: A look into the process[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2006, 59 (1): 10- 18.
8	Desmet P , Nagard E L , Vinzi V E . Refund depth effects on the impact of price-beating guarantees[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2012, 65 (5): 600- 608.
9	周正勇, 林志炳. 策略顾客下的差价补偿和清货补贴机制研究[J]. 福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2014, 28 (3): 51- 55.
10	彭志强, 熊中楷, 李根道. 考虑策略性顾客的动态定价和差价返还机制[J]. 管理工程学报, 2010, 24 (4): 53- 57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6062.2010.04.008
11	王晓玉. 零售商差价补偿策略对消费者光顾购买意愿的影响[J]. 当代经济管理, 2009, 31 (5): 34- 38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0461.2009.05.007
12	Chen Y , Narasimhan C , Zhang Z J . Consumer heterogeneity and competitive price-matching guarantees[J]. Marketing Science, 2001, 20 (3): 300- 314. doi: 10.1287/mksc.20.3.300.9766
13	Levin Y , Mcgill J , Nediak M . Price guarantees in dynamic pricing and revenue management[J]. Operations Research, 2007, 55 (1): 75- 97. doi: 10.1287/opre.1060.0344
14	Su X , Zhang F . On the value of commitment and availability guarantees when selling to strategic consumers[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2009, 55 (5): 713- 726.
15	张喆, 蒋青云. 基于价格保护策略的渠道协调[J]. 管理学报, 2009, 6 (2): 241- 245. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2009.02.015
16	Arbatskaya M , Hviid M , Shaffer G . On the incidence and variety of Low-price guarantees[J]. Journal of Law & Economics, 2004, 47 (1): 307- 332.
17	曾庆成, 岳安娜, 孙赫迎, 等. 基于差价补偿策略的集装箱班轮运输定价模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2017, 37 (9): 2366- 2372.
18	任建标, 董效涛. 使用差价补偿策略的寡头竞争模型[J]. 上海管理科学, 2007, 29 (5): 23- 25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9679.2007.05.008
19	陈豫浩. "差价补偿" 的博弈分析——以福州家电零售业为例[J]. 商业研究, 2005, 47 (11): 189- 191.
20	Jiang M , Meng Z Q , Shen R . Group decision-making approach without weighted aggregation operators[J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2018, 2018, 1- 12.
21	Zhao N G , Wang Q , Cao P . Dynamic pricing with reference price effect and price-matching policy in the presence of strategic consumers[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2019, 70 (12): 2069- 2083. doi: 10.1080/01605682.2018.1510809
22	Chen J , Chen B T . When should the offline retailer implement price matching?[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 277 (3): 996- 1009. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.03.013
23	Lin H H , Tseng T H , Yeh C H , et al. What drives customers' post-purchase price search intention in the context of online price matching guarantees[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2020, 54, 1- 10.

差价补偿系数	批发价	订购量	利润让步值	制造商利润	零售商利润
0.10	1 625.69	281.00	425 729.76	225 533.35	283 975.88
0.20	1 645.71	285.00	424 749.93	227 417.68	284 955.70
0.30	1 664.13	289.00	423 070.07	228 358.91	286 635.57
0.40	1 681.29	293.00	421 059.84	228 440.16	288 926.30
0.50	1 697.63	297.00	421 724.77	227 775.23	291 709.84
0.60	1 729.64	300.00	419 665.01	230 865.63	290 040.63
0.70	1 745.75	304.00	420 260.27	229 239.73	293 337.36
0.80	1 778.20	307.00	417 837.31	231 794.58	291 868.33
0.90	1 811.22	310.00	419 338.36	234 239.49	290 367.27
1.00	1 829.83	314.00	417 375.62	232 124.38	293 523.69

差价补偿系数	批发价	订购量	利润让步值	制造商利润	零售商利润
0.10	1 651.79	293.00	416 051.10	242 129.11	293 648.90
0.20	1 644.24	295.00	415 657.28	233 842.72	303 391.93
0.30	1 678.69	296.00	412 460.83	237 039.17	300 856.89
0.40	1 712.21	297.00	411 059.85	239 871.30	298 640.15
0.50	1 745.04	298.00	413 021.24	242 401.23	296 678.76
0.60	1 777.39	299.00	414 793.99	244 695.09	294 906.01
0.70	1 809.50	300.00	416 447.58	246 822.00	293 252.42
0.80	1 793.96	302.00	414 635.46	234 864.54	306 012.92
0.90	1 826.79	303.00	412 579.77	236 920.23	304 287.42
1.00	1 860.31	304.00	410 405.03	239 094.97	302 396.03

差价补偿系数	批发价	订购量	利润让步值	制造商利润	零售商利润
0.10	1 591.76	277.00	436 451.79	213 048.21	275 463.12
0.20	1 613.48	282.00	434 484.74	216 104.56	275 850.86
0.30	1 626.71	288.00	432 728.75	216 771.25	278 955.21
0.40	1 652.23	293.00	431 495.72	219 731.06	278 839.88
0.50	1 669.14	299.00	429 426.43	220 073.57	281 558.25
0.60	1 697.60	304.00	429 205.43	222 763.32	281 130.17
0.70	1 717.63	310.00	426 799.83	222 700.17	283 567.30
0.80	1 739.32	316.00	427 059.49	222 440.51	285 838.53
0.90	1 771.96	321.00	425 397.98	224 748.23	284 937.62
1.00	1 797.01	327.00	425 190.53	224 309.47	286 751.04

Research on price difference compensation mechanism of supply chain based on optimal concession equilibrium coordination strategy

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 3

References 23

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments