|
1
|
Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system [EB/OL]. (2008-11-01)[2021-12-15]. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
|
|
2
|
Buterin V. On public and private blockchains [EB/OL]. (2015-08-07)[2021-12-02]. https://blog.ethereum.org/2015/08/07/on-public-and-private-blockchains/.
|
|
3
|
Zetzsche D A , Arner D W , Buckley R P . Decentralized finance[J]. Journal of Financial Regulation, 2020, 6 (2): 172- 203.
|
|
4
|
Scha${\rm{\ddot r}}$ F . Decentralized finance: On blockchain-and smart contract-based financial markets[J]. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 2021, 103 (2): 153- 74.
|
|
5
|
Raval S. Decentralized Applications: Harnessing Bitcoin's Blockchain Technology [M]. California: O'Reilly Media Inc., 2016.
|
|
6
|
Adler J, Berryhill R, Veneris A, et al. Astraea: A decentralized blockchain oracle[C]// 2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things and IEEE Green Computing and Communications and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing and IEEE Smart Data, 2018: 1145-1152.
|
|
7
|
Caldarelli G . Understanding the blockchain oracle problem: a call for action[J]. Information, 2020, 11 (11): 509.
|
|
8
|
Fairfield J. Tokenized: The law of non-fungible tokens and unique digital property [EB/OL]. (2021-04-06)[2021-12-06]. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3821102.
|
|
9
|
Wang Q, Li R, Wang Q, et al. Non-fungible token (NFT): Overview, evaluation, opportunities and challenges [J]. 2021, arXiv: 2105.07447.
|
|
10
|
Kugler L . Non-fungible tokens and the future of art[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2021, 64 (9): 19- 20.
|
|
11
|
Angeris G, Chitra T. Improved price oracles: Constant function market makers [C]// Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies, 2020: 80-91.
|
|
12
|
Xu J, Vavryk N, Paruch K, et al. SoK: Decentralized Exchanges (DEX) with Automated Market Maker (AMM) protocols [J]. 2021, arXiv: 2103.12732.
|
|
13
|
Jiao Y, Wang P, Niyato D, et al. Social welfare maximization auction in edge computing resource allocation for mobile blockchain [C]// 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2018: 1-6.
|
|
14
|
Guo S , Dai Y , Guo S , et al. Blockchain meets edge computing: Stackelberg game and double auction based task offloading for mobile blockchain[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2020, 69 (5): 5549- 5561.
|
|
15
|
Hassija V, Bansal G, Chamola V, et al. Blockcom: A blockchain based commerce model for smart communities using auction mechanism [C]// 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops. IEEE, 2019: 1-6.
|
|
16
|
Wang J , Wang Q , Zhou N , et al. A novel electricity transaction mode of microgrids based on blockchain and continuous double auction[J]. Energies, 2017, 10 (12): 1971.
|
|
17
|
Wang J , Lu N , Cheng Q , et al. A secure spectrum auction scheme without the trusted party based on the smart contract[J]. Digital Communications and Networks, 2021, 7 (2): 223- 234.
|
|
18
|
Fan X , Huo Y . Blockchain based dynamic spectrum access of non-real-time data in cyber-physical-social systems[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 64486- 64498.
|
|
19
|
Sonnino A, Król M, Tasiopoulos A G, et al. ASTERISK: Auction-based shared economy resolution system for blockchain [J]. 2019, arXiv: 1901.07824.
|
|
20
|
Sonnino A, Król M, Tasiopoulos A G, et al. Asterisk: Auction-based shared economy resolution system for blockchain [J]. 2019, arXiv: 1901.07824.
|
|
21
|
Xiong W , Xiong L . Anti-collusion data auction mechanism based on smart contract[J]. Information Sciences, 2021, 555, 386- 409.
|
|
22
|
Vishnia G R , Peters G W . AuditChain: A trading audit platform over blockchain[J]. Frontiers in Blockchain, 2020,
|
|
23
|
Shi Z, de Laat C, Grosso P, et al. When blockchain meets auction models: A survey, some applications, and challenges [J]. 2021, arXiv: 2110.12534.
|
|
24
|
Daian P, Goldfeder S, Kell T, et al. Flash boys 2.0: Frontrunning in decentralized exchanges, miner extractable value, and consensus instability [C]// 2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2020: 910-927.
|
|
25
|
Qin K, Zhou L, Gervais A. Quantifying blockchain extractable value: How dark is the forest? [J]. 2021, arXiv: 2101.05511.
|
|
26
|
Sanka A I , Irfan M , Huang I , et al. A survey of breakthrough in blockchain technology: Adoptions, applications, challenges and future research[J]. Computer Communications, 2021, 169 (10): 179- 201.
|
|
27
|
Yaga D, Mell P, Roby N, et al. Blockchain technology overview [J]. 2019, arXiv: 1906.11078.
|
|
28
|
Lin I C , Liao T C . A survey of blockchain security issues and challenges[J]. International Journal of Network Security, 2017, 19 (5): 653- 659.
|
|
29
|
Eyal I, Sirer E G. Majority is not enough: Bitcoin mining is vulnerable [C]// International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Ddata Security, 2014: 436-454.
|
|
30
|
Sapirshtein A, Sompolinsky Y, Zohar A. Optimal selfish mining strategies in bitcoin [C]// International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 2016: 515-532.
|
|
31
|
Liu Z, Luong N C, Wang W, et al. A survey on applications of game theory in blockchain [J]. 2019, arXiv: 1902.10865.
|
|
32
|
Androulaki E, Barger A, Bortnikov V, et al. Hyperledger fabric: a distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains [C]// Proceedings of the thirteenth EuroSys conference, 2018: 1-15.
|
|
33
|
Guru D , Perumal S , Varadarajan V . Approaches towards blockchain innovation: A survey and future directions[J]. Electronics, 2021, 10 (10): 1219.
|
|
34
|
Merkle R C. A digital signature based on a conventional encryption function [C]// Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques, 1987: 369-378.
|
|
35
|
Gervais A, Karame G O, Wüst K, et al. On the security and performance of proof of work blockchains [C]// Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2016: 3-16.
|
|
36
|
Gilad Y, Hemo R, Micali S, et al. Algorand: Scaling byzantine agreements for cryptocurrencies [C]// Proceedings of the 26th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, 2017: 51-68.
|
|
37
|
Castro M , Liskov B . Practical byzantine fault tolerance[J]. Operating Systems Design and Implementation, 1999, 99 (1999): 173- 186.
|
|
38
|
Szabo N . Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks[J]. First Monday, 1997, 2 (9)
|
|
39
|
Wood G . Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger[J]. Ethereum Project Yellow Ppaper, 2014, 151, 1- 32.
|
|
40
|
Ashizawa N, Yanai N, Cruz J P, et al. Eth2Vec: Learning contract-wide code representations for vulnerability detection on ethereum smart contracts [C]// Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Symposium on Blockchain and Secure Critical Infrastructure, 2021: 47-59.
|
|
41
|
Zoltu M. EIP-2718: Typed transaction envelope [EB/OL]. (2020-06-13)[2021-12-02].
|
|
42
|
Aggarwal G, Hartline J D. Knapsack auctions [C]// Seventeenth Acm-Siam Symposium on Discrete Algorithm, 2006: 1083–1092.
|
|
43
|
Roughgarden T. Transaction fee mechanism design [J]. 2021, arXiv: 2106.01340.
|
|
44
|
Roughgarden T. Transaction fee mechanism design for the ethereum blockchain: An economic analysis of eip-1559 [J]. 2020, arXiv: 2012.00854.
|
|
45
|
Chung H, Shi E. Foundations of transaction fee mechanism design [J]. 2021, arXiv: 2111.03151.
|
|
46
|
Entriken W, Shirley D, Evans J, et al. EIP-721: Non-fungible token standard [EB/OL]. (2018-01-24)[2021-12-02].
|
|
47
|
Vogelsteller F, Buterin V. EIP-20: Token standard [EB/OL]. (2015-11-19)[2021-12-02].
|
|
48
|
CoinGecko. 2021 Q3数字资产行业季度报告[EB/OL]. (2021-10-21)[2021-12-15]. https://assets.coingecko.com/reports/2021-Q3-Report/CoinGecko-2021-Q3-Report-CN.pdf.
|
|
49
|
Radomski W, Cooke A, Castonguay P. EIP-1155: Multi token standard [EB/OL]. (2018-06-17)[2021-12-02].
|
|
50
|
Lockyer M, Mudge N, Schalm J. EIP-998: ERC-998 composable non-fungible token standard [EB/OL]. (2018-07-07)[2021-12-02].
|
|
51
|
Mussenbrock C. EIP-1523: Standard for insurance policies as ERC-721 non fungible tokens [EB/OL]. (2018-10-10)[2021-12-02].
|
|
52
|
Burks Z, Morgan J, Malone B, et al. EIP-2981: NFT royalty standard [EB/OL]. (2020-09-15)[2021-12-02].
|
|
53
|
Kong D R , Lin T C . Alternative investments in the Fintech era: The risk and return of non-fungible token (NFT)[J]. Social Science, 2021, 3914085.
|
|
54
|
Krishna V . Auction Theory[M]. San Diego: Academic Press, 2002.
|
|
55
|
Milgrom P , Weber R J . The value of information in a sealed-bid auction[J]. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1982, 10 (1): 105- 114.
|
|
56
|
Vickrey W . Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1961, 1 (1): 8- 37.
|
|
57
|
Myerson R . Optimal auction design[J]. Mathematics of Operations Research, 1981, 6 (1): 58- 73.
|
|
58
|
Baye M R , Kovenock D , De Vries C G . The all-pay auction with complete information[J]. Economic Theory, 1996, 8 (2): 291- 305.
|
|
59
|
Clarke E . Multipart pricing of public goods[J]. Public Choice, 1971, 11 (1): 17- 33.
|
|
60
|
Groves T . Incentives in teams[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1973, 41 (4): 617- 631.
|
|
61
|
Jansen B J , Mullen T . Sponsored search: An overview of the concept, history, and technology[J]. International Journal of Electronic Business, 2008, 6 (2): 114- 131.
|
|
62
|
Edelman B , Ostrovsky M , Schwarz M . Internet advertising and the generalized second-price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords[J]. American Economic Review, 2007, 97 (1): 242- 259.
|
|
63
|
Edelman B , Ostrovsky M . Strategic bidder behavior in sponsored search auctions[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2007, 43 (1): 192- 198.
|
|
64
|
Basu S, Easley D, O'Hara M, et al. StableFees: A Predictable Fee Market for Cryptocurrencies [EB/OL]. (2019-01-30)[2021-12-07]. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3318327.
|
|
65
|
Lavi R, Sattath O, Zohar A. Redesigning Bitcoin's fee market [C]// The World Wide Web Conference, 2019: 2950-2956.
|
|
66
|
Yao A C C. An incentive analysis of some Bitcoin fee designs [J]. 2018, arXiv: 1811.02351.
|
|
67
|
Goldberg A V , Hartline J D , Karlin A R , et al. Competitive auctions[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2006, 55 (2): 242- 269.
|
|
68
|
Chatterjee K, Goharshady A K, Pourdamghani A. Probabilistic smart contracts: Secure randomness on the blockchain [C]// 2019 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency, 2019: 403-412.
|
|
69
|
Alsalami N, Zhang B. Uncontrolled randomness in blockchains: Covert bulletin board for illicit activity [C]// 2020 IEEE/ACM 28th International Symposium on Quality of Service, 2020: 1-10.
|
|
70
|
Buterin V. Blockchain resource pricing [EB/OL]. (2018-08-08)[2021-12-02]. https://ethresear.ch/uploads/default/original.
|
|
71
|
Buterin V, Conner E, Dudley R, et al. EIP-1559 specification [EB/OL]. (2019-04-13)[2021-12-02].
|
|
72
|
Leonardos S, Monnot B, Reijsbergen D, et al. Dynamical analysis of the EIP-1559 ethereum fee market [J]. 2021, arXiv: 2102.10567.
|
|
73
|
Reijsbergen D, Sridhar S, Monnot B, et al. Transaction fees on a honeymoon: Ethereum's EIP-1559 one month later [J]. 2021, arXiv: 2110.04753.
|
|
74
|
Wei Z , Lin M . Auction vs. posted-price: Market mechanism, lender behaviors, and transaction outcomes in online crowdfunding[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2017,
|
|
75
|
Ferreira M V X, Moroz D J, Parkes D C, et al. Dynamic posted-price mechanisms for the blockchain transaction-fee market [J]. 2021, arXiv: 2103.14144.
|
|
76
|
Cachin C , Kursawe K , Shoup V . Random oracles in constantinople: Practical asynchronous byzantine agreement using cryptography[J]. Journal of Cryptology, 2005, 18 (3): 219- 246.
|
|
77
|
Bhat A, Shrestha N, Luo Z, et al. Randpiper-reconfiguration-friendly random beacons with quadratic communication [C]// Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2021: 3502-3524.
|
|
78
|
Das S, Krishnan V, Isaac I M, et al. SPURT: Scalable distributed randomness beacon with transparent setup [EB/OL]. [2021-12-08].
|
|
79
|
Cryptopunks [EB/OL]. [2021-12-15]. https://www.larvalabs.com/cryptopunks.
|
|
80
|
BAYC [EB/OL]. [2021-12-15]. https://boredapeyachtclub.com/.
|
|
81
|
Galal H S, Youssef A M. Verifiable sealed-bid auction on the ethereum blockchain [C]// International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 2018: 265-278.
|
|
82
|
Douceur J R. The sybil attack [C] //International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems, 2002: 251-260.
|
|
83
|
Levine B N, Shields C, Margolin N B. A survey of solutions to the sybil attack [D]. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2006.
|
|
84
|
Swathi P, Modi C, Patel D. Preventing sybil attack in blockchain using distributed behavior monitoring of miners [C]// 2019 10th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies. IEEE, 2019: 1-6.
|
|
85
|
Beres F, Seres I A, Benczur A A, et al. Blockchain is watching you: Profiling and deanonymizing ethereum users [C]// 2021 IEEE International Conference on Decentralized Applications and Infrastructures, 2021: 69-78.
|
|
86
|
Yokoo M , Sakurai Y , Matsubara S . The effect of false-name bids in combinatorial auctions: New fraud in Internet auctions[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2004, 46 (1): 174- 188.
|
|
87
|
Stiglitz J E . Pareto efficient and optimal taxation and the new new welfare economics[J]. Handbook of Public Economics, 1987, 2 (2): 991- 1042.
|
|
88
|
Iwasaki A, Conitzer V, Omori Y, et al. Worst-case efficiency ratio in false-name-proof combinatorial auction mechanisms [C]// International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, 2010: 633-640.
|
|
89
|
Chen H, Cheng Y, Deng X, et al. ABSNFT: Securitization and repurchase scheme for non-fungible tokens based on game theoretical analysis [J]. 2022, arXiv: 2202.02199.
|
|
90
|
Elton E J , Gruber M J . Modern portfolio theory, 1950 to date[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 1997, 21 (11/12): 1743- 1759.
|
|
91
|
Agarwal S , Barrett J , Cun C , et al. The asset-backed securities markets, the crisis and TALF[J]. Economic Perspectives, 2010, 34 (4): 101- 115.
|
|
92
|
Tim Roughgarden. Lecture #5: Incentives in peer-to-peer networks [EB/OL]. (2016-10-10)[2021-12-15].
|
|
93
|
Flashbots [EB/OL]. [2021-12-15].
|
|
94
|
Saad M, Njilla L, Kamhoua C, et al. Mempool optimization for defending against ddos attacks in pow-based blockchain systems [C]// 2019 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency, 2019: 285-292.
|
|
95
|
Jofre-Bonet M , Pesendorfer M . Estimation of a dynamic auction game[J]. Econometrica, 2003, 71 (5): 1443- 1489.
|
|
96
|
Weed J, Perchet V, Rigollet P. Online learning in repeated auctions [C]// Conference on Learning Theory, 2016: 1562-1583.
|
|
97
|
Li C, Yan X, Deng X, et al. Latent dirichlet allocation for internet price war [C]// Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019: 639-646.
|
|
98
|
Cheng R, Zhang F, Kos J, et al. Ekiden: A platform for confidentiality-preserving, trustworthy, and performant smart contracts [C]// 2019 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2019: 185-200.
|
|
99
|
Chen H , Chen Z , Cheng Y , et al. A provable softmax reputation-based protocol for permissioned blockchains[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 2021, (01): 1- 10.
|
|
100
|
Chen N, Deng X, Zhang J. How profitable are strategic behaviors in a market? [C]// European Symposium on Algorithms, 2011: 106-118.
|
|
101
|
Deng X, Lavi R, Lin T, et al. A game-theoretic analysis of the empirical revenue maximization algorithm with eEndogenous sampling [J]. 2020, arXiv: 2010.05519.
|
|
102
|
Kagel J H , Levin D . Common Value Auctions and the Winner's Curse[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.
|
|
103
|
Chen Z, Yang G. Decentralized custody scheme with game-theoretic security [J]. 2020, arXiv: 2008.10895.
|