复杂多层次指标合成技术及效率分析

doi:10.15960/j.cnki.issn.1007-6093.2020.04.003

运筹学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 39-50.doi: 10.15960/j.cnki.issn.1007-6093.2020.04.003

复杂多层次指标合成技术及效率分析

曹莉^1,3, 马占新^2,*, 马生昀⁴

1. 内蒙古大学数学科学学院, 呼和浩特 010021;
2. 内蒙古大学经济管理学院, 呼和浩特 010021;
3. 内蒙古医科大学计算机信息学院, 呼和浩特 010110;
4. 内蒙古农业大学理学院, 呼和浩特 010018

收稿日期:2018-12-28 发布日期:2020-11-18
通讯作者: 马占新 E-mail:em_mazhanxin@imu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（Nos.71661025，71261017，71661027），内蒙古自然科学基金（Nos.2019MS07008，2017JQ02，2016MS0705），内蒙古草原英才项目（No.12000-12102012），内蒙古数据科学与大数据学会课题（No.BDY18007），内蒙古大学自主科研项目（No.20700-5187023）

The synthesis technology and efficiency analysis of multi-level complex index system

CAO Li^1,3, MA Zhanxin^2,*, MA Shengyun⁴

1. School of Mathematics Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China;
3. College of Computer and Information, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010110, China;
4. School of Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China

Received:2018-12-28 Published:2020-11-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 数据包络分析（data envelopment analysis，DEA）方法在评价复杂系统效率问题时，由于评价指标过多，常常导致多个单元有效，使评价结果失去意义，而把指标合成为几个主要指标，又很难找到针对原始指标的投影。为解决上述问题，给出了一种用于面向输出的复杂系统效率评价的DEA模型，探讨了相应的DEA有效性含义、模型性质以及模型的求解方法。最后，利用该方法对内蒙古自治区14所三甲医院综合运营效率进行了分析。

关键词: 复杂系统, 综合评价, 多目标决策, 数据包络分析, 指标合成

Abstract: DEA method often leads to multiple units being effective and makes the evaluation results meaningless when evaluating the efficiency of complex systems. It is difficult to find the projection of the original index when these indexes are synthesized into several main indexes. In order to solve the above problems, a DEA model for efficiency evaluation of output-oriented complex systems is presented in this paper. The meanings of DEA validity, model properties and solving methods of the model are discussed. Finally, this method is used to analyze the comprehensive operation efficiency of 14 grade 3A hospitals in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.

Key words: complex system, comprehensive evaluation, multi-objective decisionmaking, data envelopment analysis, integration of index

中图分类号:

曹莉, 马占新, 马生昀. 复杂多层次指标合成技术及效率分析[J]. 运筹学学报, 2020, 24(4): 39-50.

CAO Li, MA Zhanxin, MA Shengyun. The synthesis technology and efficiency analysis of multi-level complex index system[J]. Operations Research Transactions, 2020, 24(4): 39-50.

参考文献

[1] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 6(2):429-444.
[2] Fare R, Grosskopf S. A nonparametric cost approach to scale efficiency[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1985, 87(4):594-604.
[3] Takamura Y, Tone K. A comparative site evaluation study for relocating Japanese government agencies out of Tokyo[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2003, 37(2):85-102.
[4] Cooper W W, Seiford L M, Thanassoulis E, et al. DEA and its uses in different countries[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 154(2):337-344.
[5] Kong W H, Fu T T. Assessing the performance of business colleges in Taiwan using data envelopment analysis and student based value-added performance indicators[J]. Omega, 2012, 40(5):541-549.
[6] Chen T Y. Measuring firm performance with DEA and prior information in Taiwan's banks[J]. Applied Economics Letters, 2002, 9(3):201-204.
[7] Banker R D, Charnes A, Cooper W W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis[J]. Management Science, 1984, 30(9):1078-1092.
[8] Seiford L M, Thrall R M. Recent development in DEA:The mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis[J]. Journal of Economics, 1990, 46(1-2):7-38.
[9] 马占新. 数据包络分析方法的研究进展[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2002, 24(3):42-46.
[10] Emrouznejad A, Yang G L. A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA:1978-2016[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2017:1-6.
[11] Premachandra I M. Controlling factor weights in data envelopment analysis by Incorporating decision maker's value judgement:an approach based on AHP[J]. International Journal of Information & Management Sciences, 2001, 12(2):67-82.
[12] Jablonsky J. Measuring the efficiency of production units by AHP models[J]. Mathematical & Computer Modelling, 2007, 46(7-8):1091-1098.
[13] Villa G. Multi-objective target setting in data envelopment analysis using AHP[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2009, 36(2):549-564.
[14] Pakkar M S. Using DEA and AHP for hierarchical structures of data[J]. Industrial Engineering & Management Systems, 2016, 15(1):49-62.
[15] Ramanathan R. Supplier selection problem:integrating DEA with the approaches of total cost of ownership and AHP[J]. Supply Chain Management, 2007, 12(4):258-261.
[16] Raut R D. Environmental performance:a hybrid method for supplier selection using AHP-DEA[J]. International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation, 2011, 5(1):16-29.
[17] Park S C, Lee J H. Supplier selection and stepwise benchmarking:a new hybrid model using DEA and AHP based on cluster analysis[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2017.
[18] Yang T, Kuo C. A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 147(1):128-136.
[19] Ho C B, Oh K B. Selecting internet company stocks using a combined DEA and AHP approach[J]. International Journal of Systems Science, 2010, 41(3):325-336.
[20] Feng Y J, Lu H, Bi K. An AHP/DEA method for measurement of the efficiency of R&D management activities in universities[J]. International Transactions in Operational Research, 2010, 11(2):181-191.
[21] Lin M, Lee Y, Ho T. Applying integrated DEA/AHP to evaluate the economic performance of local governments in China[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 209(2):129-140.
[22] Kumar A, Debnath R M, Shankar R, et al. Analyzing customer preference and measuring relative efficiency in telecom sector:A hybrid fuzzy AHP/DEA study[J]. Telematics & Informatics, 2015, 32(3):447-462.
[23] Zohreh E, Seyedeh A R. Evaluation of the performance of educational groups of Farhangian University, Province of Guilan, using data envelopment analysis and prioritization based on the AHP model[J]. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 2016, 11(4):116-120.
[24] 马占新, 曹莉, 包斯琴高娃. 多层次复杂系统的资源优化配置方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(7):1802-1818.
[25] 马占新. 关于若干DEA模型与方法研究[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 1999.
[26] 毕景涛, 王中华. 江苏省三级医院效率评价的数据包络分析[J]. 南京医科大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 18(3):230-233.
[27] 吴海蓉. 用归一分析法分析医院床位工作效率——以内蒙古阿拉善盟中心医院为例[J]. 内蒙古统计, 2014, (4):17-18.

复杂多层次指标合成技术及效率分析

The synthesis technology and efficiency analysis of multi-level complex index system

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵春英, 马占新. 具有偏好锥的面向输出的超效率DEA模型分析[J]. 运筹学学报, 2020, 24(1): 57-72.
[2]	陈磊, 王应明. 具有包容关系的结构异质DEA效率评价方法[J]. 运筹学学报, 2019, 23(4): 34-44.
[3]	王有森, 许皓. 基于数据包络分析的并行生产系统效率评价方法[J]. 运筹学学报, 2015, 19(4): 25-36.
[4]	王晓敏. 二阶段加法DEA模型的生产可能集与生产前沿面[J]. 运筹学学报, 2015, 19(3): 131-139.
[5]	施海柳, 王应明, 陈圣群. 不完全信息下考虑效率和规模的多时点并购决策[J]. 运筹学学报, 2015, 19(1): 65-76.
[6]	卞亦文, 孙瑜峰. 基于CAR-DEA方法的环境效率评价研究[J]. 运筹学学报, 2012, 16(2): 41-50.