Nonlinear combinational dynamic transmission rate model and COVID-19 epidemic analysis and prediction in China

Expand
  • 1. School of Mathematics, Physics and Statistics, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China
    2. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
    3. Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics, DelftUniversity of Technology, Delft 2628 XE, the Netherlands

Received date: 2020-07-22

  Online published: 2021-03-05

Abstract

Due to the difficulty in accurately estimating the basic infectious number $R_0$ and the low accuracy of single model prediction, the traditional epidemic infectious diseases studying is blocked and not widely implemented operationally. To overcome this challenge, this paper proposes a non-linear model with time varying transmission rate based on the support vector regression instead of basic infection number $R_0$. The non-linear model is applied to analyze and predict the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Firstly, the discrete values of the dynamic transmission rate are calculated. Secondly, the polynomial function, exponential function, hyperbolic function and power function are used to fit with the discrete values of the dynamic transmission rate and the corresponding prediction model is rebuilt on basis of the optimal sliding window period $k=3$. Then, on account of the evaluation indexes such as goodness of fitting, the best three prediction models are selected, and the prediction results are nonlinearly combined. Finally, the combined dynamic transmission rate model is used to analyze and predict the COVID-19 epidemic in Hubei province, outside-Hubei provinces, and the whole China. The empirical results show that the combined dynamic transmission rate model is in relatively good agreement with the COVID-19 epidemic data in different regions. The prediction of COVID-19 epidemic infection points in most provinces well reproduce the real situation. The goodness of fitting of the epidemic prediction curves in Hubei province, outside-Hubei provinces and the whole China from February 27, 2020 are 98.53%, 98.06% and 97.98%, respectively.

Cite this article

Xiaojin XIE, Kangyang LUO, Yi ZHANG, Jianbing JIN, Haixiang LIN, Zhixiang YIN, Guoqiang WANG . Nonlinear combinational dynamic transmission rate model and COVID-19 epidemic analysis and prediction in China[J]. Operations Research Transactions, 2021 , 25(1) : 17 -30 . DOI: 10.15960/j.cnki.issn.1007-6093.2021.01.002

References

1 Wu J , Leung K , Leung G . Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395, 689- 697.
2 王霞, 唐三一, 陈勇, 等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情下武汉及周边地区何时复工? 数据驱动的网络模型分析[J]. 中国科学: 数学, 2020, 50 (7): 969- 978.
3 Yang Z , Zeng Z , Wang K , et al. Modified SEIR and AI prediction of the epidemics trend of COVID-19 in China under public health interventions[J]. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 2020, 12 (2): 165- 174.
4 Tang B , Wang X , Li Q , et al. Estimation of the transmission risk of the 2019-nCoV and its implication for public health interventions[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2020, 9 (2): 462.
5 王志心, 刘治, 刘兆军. 基于机器学习的新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)疫情分析及预测[J]. 生物医学工程研究, 2020, 39 (01): 1- 5.
6 金启轩. 中国新冠肺炎疫情预测建模与理性评估[J]. 统计与决策, 2020, 36 (5): 11- 14.
7 张琳. 新冠肺炎疫情传播的一般增长模型拟合与预测[J]. 电子科技大学学报, 2020, 49 (3): 345- 348.
8 Huang N E , Qiao F . A data driven time-dependent transmission rate for tracking an epidemic: a case study of 2019-nCoV[J]. Science Bulletin (Beijing), 2020, 65 (6): 425- 427.
9 胡云鹤, 刘艳云, 吴凌霄, 等. 动态传播率模型及其在疫情分析中的应用[J]. 运筹学学报, 2020, 24 (3): 27- 42.
10 胡云鹤, 孔京, 杨路, 等. 动态增长率模型与海外新冠疫情分析[J]. 应用数学学报, 2020, 43 (2): 452- 467.
11 丁志伟, 刘艳云, 孔京, 等. 感染人数期望值估计及新增确诊人数趋势预测的概率模型[J]. 运筹学学报, 2020, 24 (1): 1- 12.
12 Smola A J , Scholkopf B . A tutorial on support vector regression[J]. Statistics and Computing, 2004, 14 (3): 199- 222.
13 Vapnik V N . Statistical Learning Theory[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
14 刘方园, 王水花, 张煜东. 支持向量机模型与应用综述[J]. 计算机系统应用, 2018, 27 (4): 1- 9.
15 Bates J M , Granger C W . The combination of forecasts[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2001, 20 (4): 391- 410.
16 严欢, 卢继平, 覃俏云, 等. 基于多属性决策和支持向量机的风电功率非线性组合预测[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2013, 37 (10): 29- 34.
17 王玉荣. 如何选择统计预测模型[J]. 中国统计, 2003, (11): 20- 21.
18 杨建文, 杨德宏, 赵福洪. 变权组合模型两种定权方法精度探讨[J]. 测绘工程, 2014, 23 (5): 29- 32.
Outlines

/