中文

Operations Research Transactions >

2020 , Vol. 24 >Issue 4: 39 - 50

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15960/j.cnki.issn.1007-6093.2020.04.003

The synthesis technology and efficiency analysis of multi-level complex index system

Expand
  • 1. School of Mathematics Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China;
    3. College of Computer and Information, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010110, China;
    4. School of Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China

Received date: 2018-12-28

  Online published: 2020-11-18

Fold

Abstract

DEA method often leads to multiple units being effective and makes the evaluation results meaningless when evaluating the efficiency of complex systems. It is difficult to find the projection of the original index when these indexes are synthesized into several main indexes. In order to solve the above problems, a DEA model for efficiency evaluation of output-oriented complex systems is presented in this paper. The meanings of DEA validity, model properties and solving methods of the model are discussed. Finally, this method is used to analyze the comprehensive operation efficiency of 14 grade 3A hospitals in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.

Key words： complex system; comprehensive evaluation; multi-objective decisionmaking; data envelopment analysis; integration of index

Cite this article

CAO Li, MA Zhanxin, MA Shengyun . The synthesis technology and efficiency analysis of multi-level complex index system[J]. Operations Research Transactions, 2020 , 24(4) : 39 -50 . DOI: 10.15960/j.cnki.issn.1007-6093.2020.04.003

References

[1] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 6(2):429-444.
[2] Fare R, Grosskopf S. A nonparametric cost approach to scale efficiency[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1985, 87(4):594-604.
[3] Takamura Y, Tone K. A comparative site evaluation study for relocating Japanese government agencies out of Tokyo[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2003, 37(2):85-102.
[4] Cooper W W, Seiford L M, Thanassoulis E, et al. DEA and its uses in different countries[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 154(2):337-344.
[5] Kong W H, Fu T T. Assessing the performance of business colleges in Taiwan using data envelopment analysis and student based value-added performance indicators[J]. Omega, 2012, 40(5):541-549.
[6] Chen T Y. Measuring firm performance with DEA and prior information in Taiwan's banks[J]. Applied Economics Letters, 2002, 9(3):201-204.
[7] Banker R D, Charnes A, Cooper W W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis[J]. Management Science, 1984, 30(9):1078-1092.
[8] Seiford L M, Thrall R M. Recent development in DEA:The mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis[J]. Journal of Economics, 1990, 46(1-2):7-38.
[9] 马占新. 数据包络分析方法的研究进展[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2002, 24(3):42-46.
[10] Emrouznejad A, Yang G L. A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA:1978-2016[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2017:1-6.
[11] Premachandra I M. Controlling factor weights in data envelopment analysis by Incorporating decision maker's value judgement:an approach based on AHP[J]. International Journal of Information & Management Sciences, 2001, 12(2):67-82.
[12] Jablonsky J. Measuring the efficiency of production units by AHP models[J]. Mathematical & Computer Modelling, 2007, 46(7-8):1091-1098.
[13] Villa G. Multi-objective target setting in data envelopment analysis using AHP[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2009, 36(2):549-564.
[14] Pakkar M S. Using DEA and AHP for hierarchical structures of data[J]. Industrial Engineering & Management Systems, 2016, 15(1):49-62.
[15] Ramanathan R. Supplier selection problem:integrating DEA with the approaches of total cost of ownership and AHP[J]. Supply Chain Management, 2007, 12(4):258-261.
[16] Raut R D. Environmental performance:a hybrid method for supplier selection using AHP-DEA[J]. International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation, 2011, 5(1):16-29.
[17] Park S C, Lee J H. Supplier selection and stepwise benchmarking:a new hybrid model using DEA and AHP based on cluster analysis[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2017.
[18] Yang T, Kuo C. A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 147(1):128-136.
[19] Ho C B, Oh K B. Selecting internet company stocks using a combined DEA and AHP approach[J]. International Journal of Systems Science, 2010, 41(3):325-336.
[20] Feng Y J, Lu H, Bi K. An AHP/DEA method for measurement of the efficiency of R&D management activities in universities[J]. International Transactions in Operational Research, 2010, 11(2):181-191.
[21] Lin M, Lee Y, Ho T. Applying integrated DEA/AHP to evaluate the economic performance of local governments in China[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 209(2):129-140.
[22] Kumar A, Debnath R M, Shankar R, et al. Analyzing customer preference and measuring relative efficiency in telecom sector:A hybrid fuzzy AHP/DEA study[J]. Telematics & Informatics, 2015, 32(3):447-462.
[23] Zohreh E, Seyedeh A R. Evaluation of the performance of educational groups of Farhangian University, Province of Guilan, using data envelopment analysis and prioritization based on the AHP model[J]. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 2016, 11(4):116-120.
[24] 马占新, 曹莉, 包斯琴高娃. 多层次复杂系统的资源优化配置方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(7):1802-1818.
[25] 马占新. 关于若干DEA模型与方法研究[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 1999.
[26] 毕景涛, 王中华. 江苏省三级医院效率评价的数据包络分析[J]. 南京医科大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 18(3):230-233.
[27] 吴海蓉. 用归一分析法分析医院床位工作效率——以内蒙古阿拉善盟中心医院为例[J]. 内蒙古统计, 2014, (4):17-18.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉