运筹学

基于数据包络分析的并行生产系统效率评价方法

展开
  • 1. 上海大学悉尼工商学院, 上海 201800; 2. 安徽大学商学院, 合肥 230039

收稿日期: 2014-03-05

  网络出版日期: 2015-12-15

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(No. 71371010)

Parallel production systems efficiency evaluation based on DEA

Expand
  • 1.Sydney Institute of Language Commerce, Shanghai University, Shanghai 201800, China; 2.School of Business, Anhui University,Hefei 230039, China

Received date: 2014-03-05

  Online published: 2015-12-15

摘要

数据包络分析是一种评价具有多投入、多产出决策单元的相对效率的线性规划方法.在现实世界中,决策单元有时呈现出由多个独立子系统构成的复杂并联网络系统,各子系统的投入/产出之和构成了系统的总投入/产出. 目前,用于评价这种具有并联网络生产系统相对效率的模型主要有三种:网络 DEA 模型、多部门 DEA 模型和关联 DEA 模型.现有这些模型的基本特性和相互关系存在着不足,即子系统的效率分解和优化指数不唯一. 为解决这一问题,提出了改进的并联 DEA 模型,并采用加拿大银行系统实例来说明所提出模型的合理性和有效性.

本文引用格式

王有森, 许皓 . 基于数据包络分析的并行生产系统效率评价方法[J]. 运筹学学报, 2015 , 19(4) : 25 -36 . DOI: 10.15960/j.cnki.issn.1007-6093.2015.04.003

Abstract

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a linear programming approach for evaluating relative efficiency of peer decision making units (DMUs) that consume multiple inputs to produce multiple outputs. DMUs can have parallel independent sub-units, where inputs and outputs of each DMU are the sum of those its sub-units. This paper investigates the properties and relationships of the existing parallel DEA models, i.e., network, multi-component and relational DEA models, that address measuring the performance of parallel production systems. A major limitation of the existing DEA models is that efficiency optimization may produce multiple sets of efficiency scores for individual sub-units. The current paper proposes a new DEA approache through efficiency decomposition to deal with this problem. A case of Canadian bank branches is employed to illustrate these parallel DEA approach.

参考文献

Yang Y, Ma B, Koike M. Efficiency-measuring DEA model for production system with k independent subsystems [J]. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 2000, 4: 343-353.
Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units [J].European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2: 429-444.
F\"{a}re R, Grosskopf S. Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach [J].Economics Letters, 1996, 50: 65-70.


F\"{a}re R, Grosskopf S. Network DEA [J].Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2000, 34: 35-49.

Castelli L, Pesenti R, Ukovich W. DEA-like models for the efficiency evaluation of hierarchically structured units [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 154: 465-476.
Cook W D, Hababou M, Tuenter H J H. Multicomponent efficiency measurement and shared inputs in DEA: an application to sales and service performance in bank branches [J].Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2000, 14: 209-224.
 Cook W D, Hababou M. Sales performance measurement in bank branches [J].Omega, 2001, 29: 299-307.
Jahanshahloo G R, Amirteimoori A, Kordrostami S. Multi-component performance, progress and regress measurement and shared inputs and outputs in DEA for panel data: an application in commercial bank branches [J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2004,151: 1-16.
Amirteimoori A R, Kordrostami S. DEA-like models for multi-component performance measurement [J].Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2005, 163: 735-743.
Kao C. Efficiency measurement for parallel production systems [J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 196: 1107-1112.
Kao C. Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: A relational model [J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 192: 949-962.
Kao C, Hwang S N. Efficiency measurement for network systems: IT impact on firm performance [J]. Decision Support Systems, 2010, 48: 437-446.
许皓, 孙艳红, 卞亦文. 基于主从博弈的两部门并行系统的效率评价 [J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 22(5): 115-120.
段永瑞, 田澎, 张卫平. 具有独立子系统的~DEA~模型及其应用 [J]. 管理工程学报, 2006,20(1): 27-31.
 杨锋, 梁樑, 凌六一, 等. 并联结构决策单元的 DEA 效率评价研究 [J].中国管理科学, 2009, 17(6): 157-162.
葛虹, 黄祎. 并形系统的 3 种网络 DEA 模型与应用选择 [J]. 系统管理学报, 2010, 19(2): 197-203.
陈凯华, 官建成. 共享投入型关联两阶段生产系统的网络~DEA~效率测度与分解 [J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2011, 31(7): 1211-1221.
Hua Z, Bian Y. Performance measurement for network DEA with undesirable factors [J]. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 2008, 9: 141-152.
Chen Y, Cook W D, Li N, et al. Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 196: 1170-1176.
Cook W D, Zhu J, Bi G, et al. Network DEA: Additive efficiency decomposition [J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207: 1122-1129.
Wang Y M, Chin K S. Some alternative DEA models for two-stage process [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37: 8799-8808.

 
文章导航

/