北大中文核心期刊
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
中国科技核心期刊
入选数学领域高质量科技期刊
Scopus
EBSCO 
运筹与管理前沿:模型、算法及其应用专辑

投资组合最优清算问题的双层规划模型

  • 李雪鹏 ,
  • 徐凤敏
展开
  • 1. 西安财经大学数学学院, 陕西西安 710100;
    2. 西安交通大学经济与金融学院, 陕西西安 710061

收稿日期: 2026-06-25

  网络出版日期: 2026-09-12

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(No.12471297)

A bilevel programming model for optimal portfolio liquidation problem

  • LI Xuepeng ,
  • XU Fengmin
Expand
  • 1. School of Mathematics, Xi'an University of Finance and Economics, Xi'an 710100, Shaanxi, China;
    2. School of Economics and Finance, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi, China

Received date: 2026-06-25

  Online published: 2026-09-12

摘要

针对传统最优清算模型忽视策略互动的局限,本文构建投资组合清算的双层规划模型,刻画领导者和跟随者依次交易的价格博弈过程。理论分析给出跟随者最优策略的显式刻画,证明现金约束在最优解处取等式,并量化领导者因跟随者交易承担的额外损失。针对模型的非凸嵌套结构,设计混合量子粒子群算法求解。数值实验表明,弱势地位的领导者倾向于提前清空相关资产以规避跟随者引发的价格下跌;若忽视博弈机制,领导者相对损失最高可达46.6%。

本文引用格式

李雪鹏 , 徐凤敏 . 投资组合最优清算问题的双层规划模型[J]. 运筹学学报, 2026 , 30(3) : 41 -55 . DOI: 10.15960/j.cnki.issn.1007-6093.2026.03.003

Abstract

To address the limitation of traditional optimal portfolio liquidation models that overlook strategic interactions, this paper develops a bilevel programming model for portfolio liquidation, characterizing the sequential trading game between a leader and a follower. Theoretical analysis explicitly characterizes the follower's optimal strategy, proves that the cash constraint is active at the optimum, and quantifies the leader's additional loss caused by the follower's trading. A hybrid quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm is designed to solve the nonconvex nested model. Numerical experiments show that a disadvantaged leader tends to preemptively liquidate vulnerable assets to avoid price declines triggered by the follower; ignoring the game mechanism can result in a relative loss of up to 46.6%.

参考文献

[1] Brunnermeier M K, Pedersen L H. Market liquidity and funding liquidity [J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2009, 22(6): 2201-2238.
[2] Thakor A V. The financial crisis of 2007{2009: why did it happen and what did we learn? [J]. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 2015, 4(2): 155-205.
[3] Scholes M S. Crisis and risk management [J]. The American Economic Review, 2000, 90(2): 17-21.
[4] Brown D B, Carlin B I, Lobo M S. Optimal portfolio liquidation with distress risk [J]. Management Science, 2010, 56(11): 1997-2014.
[5] Chen J, Feng L, Peng J, Ye Y. Analytical results and efficient algorithm for optimal portfolio deleveraging with market impact [J]. Operations Research, 2014, 62(1): 195-206.
[6] Carlin B I. Forced liquidation of an investment portfolio [J]. International Journal of Central Banking, 2009, 5(4): 173-176.
[7] Schied A, Schöneborn T. Risk aversion and the dynamics of optimal liquidation strategies in illiquid markets [J]. Finance and Stochastics, 2009, 13(2): 181-204.
[8] Gatheral J, Schied A. Optimal trade execution under geometric Brownian motion in the Almgren and Chriss framework [J]. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 2011, 14(3): 353-368.
[9] Ankirchner S, Blanchet-Scalliet C, Eyraud-Loisel A. Optimal portfolio liquidation with additional information [J]. Mathematics and Financial Economics, 2016, 10(1): 1-14.
[10] Cartea A, Gan L, Jaimungal S. Trading cointegrated assets with price impact [J]. Mathematical Finance, 2019, 29(2): 542-567.
[11] Xu F, Sun M, Dai Y. An adaptive lagrangian algorithm for optimal portfolio deleveraging with cross-impact [J]. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2017, 30(5): 1121-1135.
[12] Brown D B, Carlin B I, Lobo M S. On the Scholes liquidation problem [R]. Paris: Banque de France, 2009.
[13] 罗和治, 张宏伟. 最优去杠杆化问题的新分枝定界算法 [J]. 浙江工业大学学报, 2018, 46(2): 233-236.
[14] Li Y, Guo J, Lai K K, et al. Optimal portfolio liquidation with cross-price impacts on trading [J]. Operational Research, 2022, 22(1): 1083-1102.
[15] Luo H, Zhang X, Wu H, et al. Effective algorithms for separable nonconvex quadratic programming with one quadratic and box constraints [J]. Computational Optimization and Applications, 2023, 86(1): 199-240.
[16] Edirisinghe C, Jeong J, Chen J. Optimal portfolio deleveraging under market impact and margin restrictions [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2021, 294(2): 746-759.
[17] Edirisinghe C, Chen J, Jeong J. Optimal leveraged portfolio selection under quasi-elastic market impact [J]. Operations Research, 2023, 71(5): 1558-1576.
[18] Edirisinghe C, Jeong J. Mean-variance portfolio efficiency under leverage aversion and trading impact [J]. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 2022, 15(3): 98.
[19] Chen J. Optimal liquidation of financial derivatives [J]. Finance Research Letters, 2020, 34: 101233.
[20] 黄印, 罗和治. 两阶段金融衍生品清算问题的一个快速 SDP 松弛 [J]. 运筹学学报 (中英文), 2026, 30(1): 108-120.
[21] 徐凤敏, 李雪鹏. 基于概率约束的稀疏统计套利模型研究——以中国市场为例 [J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2020, 35(11): 33-42.
文章导航

/

〈 〉