基于秩2矩阵近似的飞机起降多目标调度模型与算法研究

展开
  • 1. 上海理工大学管理学院, 上海 200093
    2. 同济大学经济与管理学院, 上海 200092
徐博, E-mail: xubochn@usst.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2023-11-24

  网络出版日期: 2024-12-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(71071113);国家自然科学基金(71161016);国家社会科学基金(20BGL115)

版权

运筹学学报编辑部, 2024, 版权所有,未经授权。

Research on the multi-objective model and algorithm for aircraft takeoff/landing scheduling based on rank 2 matrix approximation

Expand
  • 1. Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
    2. School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received date: 2023-11-24

  Online published: 2024-12-20

Copyright

, 2024, All rights reserved, without authorization

摘要

飞机起降调度问题是当前机场运营的重要问题, 调度的一个难点在于调度效率提升需要空管发出大量复杂指令, 导致空管工作量骤升, 超负荷工作易引起人员疲劳产生决策失误和安全隐患。鉴于此构建了单跑道起降调度的多目标混合整数规划模型, 既提升跑道效率又避免过度增加空管工作量。设计了基于秩2矩阵近似的蚁群算法(RMA-AC)求解, 并与CPLEX和经典M-TPLP算法进行对比。数值仿真证实三种方法都优于当前航空系统广泛使用的FCFS算法; 新算法RMA-AC在跑道效率提升方面强于CPLEX, 在控制飞机位置总偏移量方面强于M-TPLP, 实现了平衡跑道效率和空管工作量。这些对于提高机场效率, 降低航空拥堵, 实现安全调度具有积极意义。

本文引用格式

徐博, 马卫民, 柯华, 张浩 . 基于秩2矩阵近似的飞机起降多目标调度模型与算法研究[J]. 运筹学学报, 2024 , 28(4) : 29 -43 . DOI: 10.15960/j.cnki.issn.1007-6093.2024.04.003

Abstract

The aircraft takeoff/landing scheduling problem is an important problem for current airport operations. One difficulty in scheduling is that improving scheduling efficiency requires air traffic controller to issue more instructions, leading to a sharp increase in air traffic control workload. Overloading work may cause personnel fatigue, decision-making errors, and safety hazards. In view of this situation, a multi-objective mixed integer programming model for single runway takeoff/landing scheduling was constructed, which not only considers improving runway efficiency but also avoids excessively increasing air traffic control workload. The rank 2 matrix approximation based ant colony (RMA-AC) algorithm was designed. In comparison with the classical M-TPLP algorithm and CPLEX optimizer, numerical result validates that all the three methods have better performance than the first come first sever (FCFS) algorithm which is widely used in current aviation system. Specifically, the new algorithm RMA-AC is better than CPLEX for the runway efficiency improvement, and better than M-TPLP for the aircraft position shift control. It balances the runway efficiency and the air traffic controller workload. All these have positive effect on the airport efficiency improvement, delay reduction and safety scheduling.

参考文献

1 Boeing. Commercial market outlook 2023—2042 [EB/OL]. (2024-02-01)[2024-02-01]. http://www.boeing.com/commercial/cmo/.
2 中国民航网[EB/OL]. (2024-01-31)[2024-02-01]. http://www.caacnews.com.cn/#.
3 Gudmundsson S V , Cattaneo M , Redondi R . Forecasting temporal world recovery in air transport markets in the presence of large economic shocks: The case of covid-19[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2021, 91 (102007): 1- 8.
4 Bennell J A , Mesgarpour M , Potts C N . Airport runway scheduling[J]. 4OR, 2011, 9, 115- 138.
5 武汉市网信办. 湖北客货"双枢纽"建设再加力天河机场三跑道拿到"准生证"[EB/OL]. (2022-04-06)[2024-02-01]. https://www.sohu.com/a/535759288_100199096.
6 Beasley J E , Krishnamoorthy M , Sharaiha Y M , et al. Scheduling aircraft landings-the static case[J]. Transportation Science, 2000, 34 (2): 180- 197.
7 Balakrishnan H , Chandran B G . Algorithms for scheduling runway operations under constrained position shifting[J]. Operations Research, 2010, 58 (6): 1650- 1665.
8 Ikli S , Mancel C , Mongeau M , et al. The aircraft runway scheduling problem: A survey[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2021, 132 (1): 1- 20.
9 Brinton C R. An implicit enumeration algorithm for arrival aircraft scheduling [C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/AIAA 11th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 1992: 268-274.
10 Prakash R , Piplani R , Desai J . An optimal data-splitting algorithm for aircraft scheduling on a single runway to maximize throughput[J]. Transportation Research Part C, 2018, 95, 570- 581.
11 Prakash R , Piplani R , Desai J . An optimal data-splitting algorithm for aircraft sequencing on two runways[J]. Transportation Research Part C, 2021, 132, 1- 15.
12 Pohl M , Kolisch R , Schiffer M . Runway scheduling during winter operations[J]. Omega, 2021, 102, 1- 16.
13 王菲, 张军峰, 葛腾腾, 等. 基于分支定界的离场航空器动态排序[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 47 (4): 547- 552.
14 张军峰, 王菲, 葛腾腾. 基于分支定界法的进场航空器动态排序与调度[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2016, 28 (8): 1909- 1914.
15 Hu X B , Chen W H . Receding horizon control for aircraft arrival sequencing and scheduling[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005, 6 (1): 189- 197.
16 Randall M C. Scheduling aircraft landings using ant colony optimization [C]//Proceedings of the I-ASTED International Conference Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, 2002.
17 Zhan Z H , Zhang J , Li Y , et al. An efficient ant colony system based on receding horizon control for the aircraft arrival sequencing and scheduling problem[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2010, 11 (2): 399- 412.
18 Wu L J, Zhan Z H, Hu X M, et al. Multi-runway aircraft arrival scheduling: A receding horizon control based ant colony system approach [C]//Proceedings of 2019 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2019: 538-545.
19 Bencheikh G , Boukachour J , Alaoui A E H . Improved ant colony algorithm to solve the aircraft landing problem[J]. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 2011, 3 (2): 224- 233.
20 Bencheikh G , Boukachour J , Alaoui A E H . A memetic algorithm to solve the dynamic multiple runway aircraft landing problem[J]. Journal of King Saud University Computer and Information Sciences, 2016, 28 (1): 98- 109.
21 李冠彬, 詹志辉, 张军. 蚁群算法优化到达航班排序和调度问题的研究[J]. 计算机工程与设计, 2009, 30 (17): 4047- 4052.
22 马卫民, 杨文娟, 徐博. 单跑道混合起降飞机排序问题的优化算法研究[J]. 系统工程学报, 2018, 33 (1): 125- 135.
23 温馨, 霍佳震. 基于动态优先级的多跑道混合起降航班调度问题研究[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2021, 26 (2): 1- 8.
24 Ma W , Xu B , Liu M , et al. An efficient approximation algorithm for aircraft arrival sequencing and scheduling problem[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 236756, 1- 8.
25 Faye A . Solving the aircraft landing problem with time discretization approach[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 242, 1028- 1038.
26 Ma W , Xu B , Liu M , et al. An efficient algorithm based on sparse optimization for the aircraft departure scheduling problem[J]. Computational & Applied Mathematics, 2016, 35, 371- 387.
27 Lieder A , Stolletz R . Scheduling aircraft take-offs and landings on interdependent and heterogeneous runways[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2016, 88, 167- 188.
28 Xu B . An efficient ant colony algorithm based on wake-vortex modeling method for aircraft scheduling problem[J]. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2017, 317, 157- 170.
29 Dorigo M. Optimization, learning and natural algorithms [D]. Milano: Politecnico di Milano, 1992.
30 黄敏, 任亮, 王兴伟. 带有随机运输时间和成本的4PL路径优化问题[J]. 系统工程学报, 2019, 34 (1): 82- 101.
31 Hancerliogullari G , Rabadi G , Al-Salem A H . Greedy algorithms and metaheuristics for a multiple runway combined arrival-departure aircraft sequencing problem[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2013, 32 (6): 39- 48.
文章导航

/