非线性组合动态传播率模型与我国COVID-19疫情分析和预测

展开
  • 1. 上海工程技术大学数理与统计学院, 上海 201620
    2. 南京信息工程大学环境科学与工程学院, 南京 210044
    3. 代尔夫特理工大学代尔夫特应用数学研究所, 代尔夫特 2628 XE, 荷兰
王国强 E-mail: guoq_wang@hotmail.com

收稿日期: 2020-07-22

  网络出版日期: 2021-03-05

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(11971302);国家自然科学基金(62072296);全国统计科学研究项目(2020LY067)

Nonlinear combinational dynamic transmission rate model and COVID-19 epidemic analysis and prediction in China

Expand
  • 1. School of Mathematics, Physics and Statistics, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China
    2. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
    3. Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics, DelftUniversity of Technology, Delft 2628 XE, the Netherlands

Received date: 2020-07-22

  Online published: 2021-03-05

摘要

针对传统的流行性传染病学中基本传染数$R_0$难以准确估计以及单一模型预测精度低的缺陷,利用组合动态传播率替换基本传染数$R_0$,提出基于支持向量回归的非线性时变传播率模型并对我国COVID-19疫情进行分析和预测。首先,计算动态传播率的离散值;其次,使用多项式函数、指数函数、双曲函数和幂函数分别对动态传播率的离散值进行拟合并基于最佳滑窗期$k=3$构建相应的预测模型;接着,基于拟合优度等评价指标选择最佳的三种单一模型并对其预测结果进行非线性组合;最后,利用非线性组合动态传播率模型对湖北、全国除湖北和全国COVID-19疫情进行分析和预测。实证结果表明提出的非线性组合动态传播率模型对不同地区COVID-19疫情数据的预测误差均相对较小;对重点省市COVID-19疫情的拐点预测切实合理;湖北、全国除湖北与全国自2020年2月27日起后20天疫情预测曲线的拟合优度分别为98.53%、98.06%和97.98%。

本文引用格式

谢晓金, 罗康洋, 张怡, 金建炳, 林海翔, 殷志祥, 王国强 . 非线性组合动态传播率模型与我国COVID-19疫情分析和预测[J]. 运筹学学报, 2021 , 25(1) : 17 -30 . DOI: 10.15960/j.cnki.issn.1007-6093.2021.01.002

Abstract

Due to the difficulty in accurately estimating the basic infectious number $R_0$ and the low accuracy of single model prediction, the traditional epidemic infectious diseases studying is blocked and not widely implemented operationally. To overcome this challenge, this paper proposes a non-linear model with time varying transmission rate based on the support vector regression instead of basic infection number $R_0$. The non-linear model is applied to analyze and predict the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Firstly, the discrete values of the dynamic transmission rate are calculated. Secondly, the polynomial function, exponential function, hyperbolic function and power function are used to fit with the discrete values of the dynamic transmission rate and the corresponding prediction model is rebuilt on basis of the optimal sliding window period $k=3$. Then, on account of the evaluation indexes such as goodness of fitting, the best three prediction models are selected, and the prediction results are nonlinearly combined. Finally, the combined dynamic transmission rate model is used to analyze and predict the COVID-19 epidemic in Hubei province, outside-Hubei provinces, and the whole China. The empirical results show that the combined dynamic transmission rate model is in relatively good agreement with the COVID-19 epidemic data in different regions. The prediction of COVID-19 epidemic infection points in most provinces well reproduce the real situation. The goodness of fitting of the epidemic prediction curves in Hubei province, outside-Hubei provinces and the whole China from February 27, 2020 are 98.53%, 98.06% and 97.98%, respectively.

参考文献

1 Wu J , Leung K , Leung G . Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395, 689- 697.
2 王霞, 唐三一, 陈勇, 等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情下武汉及周边地区何时复工? 数据驱动的网络模型分析[J]. 中国科学: 数学, 2020, 50 (7): 969- 978.
3 Yang Z , Zeng Z , Wang K , et al. Modified SEIR and AI prediction of the epidemics trend of COVID-19 in China under public health interventions[J]. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 2020, 12 (2): 165- 174.
4 Tang B , Wang X , Li Q , et al. Estimation of the transmission risk of the 2019-nCoV and its implication for public health interventions[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2020, 9 (2): 462.
5 王志心, 刘治, 刘兆军. 基于机器学习的新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)疫情分析及预测[J]. 生物医学工程研究, 2020, 39 (01): 1- 5.
6 金启轩. 中国新冠肺炎疫情预测建模与理性评估[J]. 统计与决策, 2020, 36 (5): 11- 14.
7 张琳. 新冠肺炎疫情传播的一般增长模型拟合与预测[J]. 电子科技大学学报, 2020, 49 (3): 345- 348.
8 Huang N E , Qiao F . A data driven time-dependent transmission rate for tracking an epidemic: a case study of 2019-nCoV[J]. Science Bulletin (Beijing), 2020, 65 (6): 425- 427.
9 胡云鹤, 刘艳云, 吴凌霄, 等. 动态传播率模型及其在疫情分析中的应用[J]. 运筹学学报, 2020, 24 (3): 27- 42.
10 胡云鹤, 孔京, 杨路, 等. 动态增长率模型与海外新冠疫情分析[J]. 应用数学学报, 2020, 43 (2): 452- 467.
11 丁志伟, 刘艳云, 孔京, 等. 感染人数期望值估计及新增确诊人数趋势预测的概率模型[J]. 运筹学学报, 2020, 24 (1): 1- 12.
12 Smola A J , Scholkopf B . A tutorial on support vector regression[J]. Statistics and Computing, 2004, 14 (3): 199- 222.
13 Vapnik V N . Statistical Learning Theory[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
14 刘方园, 王水花, 张煜东. 支持向量机模型与应用综述[J]. 计算机系统应用, 2018, 27 (4): 1- 9.
15 Bates J M , Granger C W . The combination of forecasts[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2001, 20 (4): 391- 410.
16 严欢, 卢继平, 覃俏云, 等. 基于多属性决策和支持向量机的风电功率非线性组合预测[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2013, 37 (10): 29- 34.
17 王玉荣. 如何选择统计预测模型[J]. 中国统计, 2003, (11): 20- 21.
18 杨建文, 杨德宏, 赵福洪. 变权组合模型两种定权方法精度探讨[J]. 测绘工程, 2014, 23 (5): 29- 32.
文章导航

/