一种资源投入不确定情形下的合作博弈形式及收益分配策略

展开
  • 1. 北京物资学院物流学院, 北京 101149;
    2. 北京理工大学管理与经济学院, 北京 100081;
    3. 首都师范大学管理学院, 北京 100089;
    4. 北京理工大学计算机学院, 北京 100081

收稿日期: 2018-03-27

  网络出版日期: 2019-12-04

基金资助

北京教委社科计划(No.SM201910037007),国家自然科学基金(Nos.71801016,71772016,71874112),教育部人文社会科学研究(No.17YJC630203)

A generalized form of fuzzy cooperative game and its solution

Expand
  • 1. School of Logistics Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing 101149, China;
    2. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
    3. School of Management, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100089, China;
    4. School of Computer, Beijing Institute of technology, Beijing 100081, China

Received date: 2018-03-27

  Online published: 2019-12-04

摘要

首先,将经典合作博弈进行扩展,提出了一类模糊联盟合作博弈的通用形式,涵盖常见三种模糊联盟合作博弈,即多线性扩展博弈、比例模糊博弈与Choquet积分模糊博弈.比例模糊博弈、Choquet积分模糊博弈的Shapley值均可以作为一种特定形式下模糊联盟合作博弈的收益分配策略,但是对于多线性扩展博弈的Shapley值一直关注较少,因此利用经典Shapley值构造出多线性扩展博弈的Shapley值,以此作为一种收益分配策略.最后,通过实例分析了常见三类模糊联盟合作博弈的形式及其对应的分配策略,分析收益最大的模糊联盟合作对策形式及最优分配策略,为不确定情形下的合作问题提供了一定的收益分配依据.

本文引用格式

于晓辉, 杜志平, 张强, 周珍, 逄金辉 . 一种资源投入不确定情形下的合作博弈形式及收益分配策略[J]. 运筹学学报, 2019 , 23(4) : 71 -85 . DOI: 10.15960/j.cnki.issn.1007-6093.2019.04.006

Abstract

Firstly, the crisp cooperative game is extended, and a kind of generalized form for cooperative game with fuzzy coalition is proposed. Three main cooperative games with fuzzy coalition are all contained in this generalized form for cooperative game with fuzzy coalition, that is, the multilinear extension game, the fuzzy game with proportional value and fuzzy game with Choquet integral form. The fuzzy Shapley value for fuzzy game with proportional value and fuzzy game with Choquet integral form are also taken as a kind allocation scheme of cooperative game with fuzzy coalition. However, the fuzzy Shapley for multilinear game is never studied, so in this paper we proposed fuzzy Shapley value by the crisp Shapley value, which is seen as a kind of allocation strategies. Finally, the three cooperative games with fuzzy coalition are analyzed respectively based on an example, and the maximum income game and the optimal allocation strategy are analyzed. The research results in this paper may put a certain decision-making basis for strategic choice of collaborative problem in low-carbon supply chain under uncertainty.

参考文献

[1] Owen G. Multilinear extensions of games[J]. Management Sciences, 1972, 18:64-79.
[2] Aubin J. P. Cooperative fuzzy games[J]. Mathematical Operation Research, 1981, 6:1-13.
[3] Aubin J. P. Mathematical Methods of Game and Economic Theory[M]. Amsterdam:North-Holland, 1982.
[4] Butnariu D. Stability and Shapley value for an n-person fuzzy games[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1980, 4:63-72.
[5] Tsurumi M, Inuiguchi M. A Shapley function on a class of cooperative fuzzy games[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 129:596-618.
[6] Yu X H, Zhang Q. The fuzzy core in games with fuzzy coalitions[J]. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2009, 230:173-186.
[7] Meng F Y, Zhang Q. The Shapley function for fuzzy cooperative games with multilinear extension form[J]. Applied Mathematics Letters, 2010, 23:644-650.
[8] Borkotokey S, Hazarika P, Mesiar R. Fuzzy Bi-cooperative games in multilinear extension form[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2015, 259:44-55.
[9] 杨洁, 李登峰. 具有交流结构的区间模糊联盟合作对策[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2015, 51:17-21.
[10] 杨靛青, 李登峰. 基于多维线性扩展的模糊联盟合作对策T值性质与计算方法[J]. 运筹学学报, 2015, 19:61-72.
[11] 杨靛青, 李登峰. 模糊联盟合作对策τ值及其计算方法[J]. 系统工程学报, 2016, 31:13-23.
[12] 卜红, 南江霞. 三人模糊联盟合作博弈的最小核心解[J]. 经济数学, 2016, 33:94-98.
[13] 冯庆华, 陈菊红, 刘通. 基于广义解的双合作博弈收益分配模型[J]. 控制与决策, 2016, 31:656-660.
[14] Yu X H, Zhou H, Zhang X F, et al. The fuzzy bargaining set of cooperative game with fuzzy coalition[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2017, 33:1757-1765.
[15] Wang Z, Xu K, Heng P A, et al. Indeterminate integral with respect to nonadditive measures[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2003, 138:485-495.
文章导航

/